| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| :: |
| Author |
Message |
dcz Administrateur - Site Admin

Joined: 28 Apr 2006 Posts: 15242
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:08 am Post subject: Re: Google supplemental? |
|
|
Well, the fact a topic did not get any answer for a long time does not necessarily mean it's not visited more than some other.
The experience I proposed goes into this direction, if you sticky an old and supplemental thread, it's likely that it will get visited a bit more, so we could see how it goes.
Then, off course, Google is the only to decide, and the criteria has become so complex that it's really hard sometime to find out reasonable reason for what's occurring.
++ |
_________________ Useful links :
SEO Forum || SEO Directory || SEO phpBB || SEO phpBB3 || Search
____________________
Liens Utiles :
Forum référencement || Annuaire référencement || Référencement phpBB || Référencement phpBB3 || Recherche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
hopster PR0

Joined: 15 Dec 2006 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:12 pm Post subject: Re: Google supplemental? |
|
|
Buggynews dot com has just now as of yesterday or today come out of supplemental for some reason. Not sure why, as I haven't changed anything in a long while.
Another thing... another site of mine has also come entirely out of supplemental at the same time as Buggynews. Coincidence?? Did google just change their supplemental index?
-Steve |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dcz Administrateur - Site Admin

Joined: 28 Apr 2006 Posts: 15242
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Navigation |
Similar Topics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |